Skip to Content Skip to Footer
Effects of Liberalization on Incumbent Firms’ Marketing Mix Responses and Performance: Evidence from a Quasi-Experiment

Effects of Liberalization on Incumbent Firms’ Marketing Mix Responses and Performance: Evidence from a Quasi-Experiment

Nandini Ramani and Raji Srinivasan

JM Insights in the Classroom

Teaching Insights

Increasing marketing spending can help incumbent firms respond effectively and achieve strong financial performance when their markets are liberalized to foreign competition.

Access Classroom Lecture Slides

Related Marketing Courses: ​
Marketing Strategy; Principles of Marketing, Core Marketing, Introduction to Marketing Management

Full Citation: ​
Ramani, Nandini and Raji Srivivasan (2019), “Effects of Liberalization on Incumbent Firms’ Marketing Mix Responses and Performance: Evidence from a Quasi-Experiment,” Journal of Marketing, 83(5), 97-114.

Article Abstract
Many markets are liberalizing by opening up their economies to foreign competition, with the expectation that this will increase economic growth. While foreign competitors with superior technology and management practices pose serious threats to incumbent firms, they also provide them an opportunity to gain new marketing knowledge. How do incumbent firms respond to liberalization? Can incumbent firms’ marketing mix responses affect their performance following liberalization? Addressing these questions, we examine incumbent firms’ marketing mix responses to liberalization and the impact of these responses on performance, using the quasi-experiment of liberalization reforms in India. Estimation results from a panel of 3,927 firms in the period 1989-2000 suggest that while all incumbent firms intensified their product and promotions in response to liberalization, only incumbent firms with greater domestic market knowledge intensified their advertising and distribution responses. Further, incumbent firms’ marketing mix responses significantly affect their performance outcomes. The research’s findings extend theory and provide practical guidelines on how incumbent firms can design marketing mix responses to liberalization to improve performance.

Advertisement

Special thanks to Kelley Gullo and Holly Howe, Ph.D. candidates at Duke University, for their support in working with authors on submissions to this program. 

Search other Insights in the Classroom​

Read a managerial summary of this paper.

More from the Journal of Marketing​​​​​​​

Nandini Ramani is Assistant Professor of Marketing, Mays Business School, Texas A&M University.

Raji Srinivasan is Sam Barshop Professor of Marketing Administration, University of Texas at Austin, USA.

The owner of this website has made a commitment to accessibility and inclusion, please report any problems that you encounter using the contact form on this website. This site uses the WP ADA Compliance Check plugin to enhance accessibility.