Skip to Content Skip to Footer
Gear Manufacturers as Contestants in Sport Competitions: Breeding and Branding Returns

Gear Manufacturers as Contestants in Sport Competitions: Breeding and Branding Returns

Yvonne van Everdingen, Vijay Hariharan and Stefan Stremersch

JM Insights in the Classroom

Teaching Insight:

Research-intense gear manufacturers have more to gain from contesting in sport competitions, as compared to advertising-intense gear manufacturers.

Download Presentation Slides

Related Marketing Courses: ​
Brand Management; Marketing Communications; Marketing Strategy ​​​​ ​​​​

Full Citation: ​
van Everdingen, Yvonne, Vijay Ganesh Hariharan, and Stefan Stremersch (2019), “Gear Manufacturers as Contestants in Sports Competitions: Breeding and Branding Returns,” Journal of Marketing, 83 (3), 126–144.

Article Abstract
Several manufacturers make substantial investments to compete in sports contests, using the gear they develop and market. However, no systematic analysis of the breeding (i.e., innovation) and branding (i.e., marketing) returns from such investments exists. In this study, the authors conceptualize and empirically estimate the breeding and branding returns that such manufacturers obtain. The authors gather data for 30 car brands of 16 manufacturers over the period 2000–2015 regarding their participation, spending, and performance in Formula One championships, annual patent citations, and research-and-development (R&D) budgets as well as monthly vehicle registrations, advertising expenditures, and Formula One TV viewership. The authors find that only gear manufacturers with relatively high levels of R&D spending obtain a positive and significant breeding return from competing in sports contests. While most brands obtain positive branding returns, the lower the level of advertising spending for the brand, the greater the branding returns they obtain from competing in these contests. Thus, research-intense (compared with advertising-intense) gear manufacturers have more to gain from competing in sports contests. These findings can help guide manufacturers in budget allocation decisions on sports competitions, R&D, and advertising.

Advertisement

Special thanks to Kelley Gullo, Ph.D. candidates at Duke University, for their support in working with authors on submissions to this program. 

Search other Insights in the Classroom​

Read a managerial summary of this paper.

More from the Journal of Marketing​​​​​​​

Yvonne van Everdingen is Associate Professor of Marketing Management, Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Vijay Ganesh Hariharan is Associate Professor of Marketing, Erasmus School of Economics, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Stefan Stremersch is Chaired Professor of Marketing and Desiderius Erasmus Distinguished Chair of Economics, Erasmus University, the Netherlands; and Professor of Marketing, Universidad de Navarra, Spain.

The owner of this website has made a commitment to accessibility and inclusion, please report any problems that you encounter using the contact form on this website. This site uses the WP ADA Compliance Check plugin to enhance accessibility.